How I'd change seminary education 3 of 8

While I have been clear in my belief that the great gift of seminary education has been the biblical, theological and historical studies, I feel at this point I need to give an example of the power and strength of theological education.  There is no better person to do that than Walter Brueggemann.  He is probably the most important biblical theologian of our time.  Retired, but certainly not tired, as an Old Testament Professor at Columbia Theological Seminary in Atlanta, GA.   This interview reveals the great gift of a seminary education.  Brueggemann helps us understand the wonder and poetic power of the scriptures.   In this interview, Krista Tipprt pulls out the best of Walter.

 

How I'd change seminary education - Part 2

Below is the results of a survey conduct by Thom Rainer.  Thom is a Southern Baptist, and I know some readers of this blog will dismiss him just because of his denominational label.  But, before you do that, read the results of his survey which was in response to this question:

What do you wish you had been told before you became a pastor?

Some of the responses were obvious. For me, a few were surprises.  Read through, and I'll offer some thoughts at the bottom.

I note them in order of frequency of response, not necessarily in order of importance. After each item, I offer a representative quote from a pastor.

  1. I wish someone had taught me basic leadership skills. “I was well grounded in theology and Bible exegesis, but seminary did not prepare me for the real world of real people. It would have been great to have someone walk alongside me before my first church.”
  2. I needed to know a lot more about personal financial issues. “No one ever told me about minister’s housing, social security, automobile reimbursement, and the difference between a package and a salary. I got burned in my first church.”
  3. I wish I had been given advice on how to deal with power groups and power people in the church. “I got it all wrong in my first two churches. I was fired outright from the first one and pressured out in the second one. Someone finally and courageously pointed out how I was messing things up almost from the moment I began in a new church. I am so thankful that I am in the ninth year of a happy pastorate in my third church.”
  4. Don’t give up your time in prayer and the Word. “I really don’t ever remember anyone pointing me in that direction. The busier I became at the church, the more I neglected my primary calling. It was a subtle process; I wish I had been forewarned.”
  5. I wish someone had told me I needed some business training. “I felt inadequate and embarrassed in the first budget meetings. And it really hit home when we looked at a building program that involved fund raising and debt. I had no clue what the bankers were saying.”
  6. Someone should have told me that there are mean people in the church. “Look, I was prepared to deal with critics. That’s the reality of any leadership position. But I never expected a few of the members to be so mean and cruel. One church member wrote something really cruel on my Facebook wall. Both my wife and children cried when they read it.”
  7. Show me how to help my kids grow up like normal kids. “I really worry about the glass house syndrome with my wife and kids. I’m particularly worried that my children will see so much of the negative that they will grow up hating the church. I’ve seen it happen too many times.”
  8. I wish I had been told to continue to date my wife/husband. “I was diligent in dating my wife/husband before I became a pastor. I then got so busy helping others with their needs that I neglected her/him. I almost lost my marriage. S/he felt so alone as I tried to meet everyone’s needs but hers/his.”
  9. Someone needed to tell me about the expectation of being omnipresent. “I had no idea that people would expect me to be at so many meetings, so many church socials, and so many sports and civic functions. It is impossible to meet all those expectations, so I left some folks disappointed or mad.”
  10. I really needed help knowing how to minister to dying people. “Some of those who have terminal illnesses have such a strong faith that they minister to me. But many of them are scared and have questions I never anticipated. I was totally unprepared for these pastoral care issues when I first became a pastor.”

 

As I read this list, I realize how the results would be amazingly similar for any group of young pastors across the whole of North American Christianity.  The only exception could be # 10.  I think many of our pastors do pretty well at this, largely through their CPE training.  In addition, I think our theological perspective helps us see death as a natural part of life.

So, when I read this list I wonder - does it resonate with you?  If it does, and I think much of it does for the many I talk with, then how should we retool our seminary education?

2014 Synod Youth Mission Trip

Group Youth Workcamp

Guilderland Center, NY

July 6-12, 2014

For: Ages 14+

Cost: $459 + Transportation

Deposit by Nov. 1, 2013:  $50

This weeklong mission trip is a great way to help your youth (age 14 and up at the time of next summer) discover their faith through service.  Come as a church group or come as an individual. 

Drive west from New England, and you'll be in a whole different world. Guilderland is a predominantly middle-class community nestled into the Capital Region of New York state. Guilderland is just minutes away from Albany and offers a mix of country and city, the best of both worlds.

Your group will be near a popular upstate New York theme park, Six Flags Great Escape. Locals enjoy a trip to Saratoga, or the many parks the town has to offer.

Hidden away in this good-looking town are pockets of lower-income areas that are often overlooked. The elderly struggle to keep up their homes that they have lived in for a generation. And in recent years, Guilderland was one of the towns ravaged by flooding.

Your week will be well-spent in Guilderland, as your group helps those who truly are not able to help themselves. Along with painting, siding, and other carpentry projects, your group will probably be upgrading the weatherization of homes as well, which will hold down heating costs and provide greater comfort for yearst to come.

 

For more information contact Pr. Tim Roser troser@nesynod.org

To register for this event, click here

 

Why Text and Talk works at Hammo

Every year on the weekend after Labor Day, the annual Youth Hammonassett camp out is held at, you guessed it, Hammonassett campground.  It's a weekend of music, speakers, cook outs, service projects, ultimate frisbee, etc.  I've been invited two years in a row.  Hmmm, wonder if I'll get an invite for next year.  Once again I held a Text and Talk with the Bish.  The format is simple.  I annoucne my cell phone number and invite 450 youth to text me any question.  Instantly, my phone lights up, and AT&T sends me messages that I've exceeded my data rate plan. (This year I got smart and grabbed an unlimited plan for the weekend)  I then answer a wide variety of questions, and the range looks something like this:

This is a good sample of the questions I am asked.  They range from even more absurd jokes about my motorcycle, questions about candy I have never heard of to the more serious faith questions.

I stand up there and randomly answer as many as I can in the 15 minute timeslot I'm given to respond.  

My answers range from silly to serious.

The challenge is to be quick, honest and true.  It ain't easy, but the challenge is great.  I know sometimes I stumble or ramble on, trying to answer questions about evil in the world in 30 seconds or less.  

How would you answer this last question on the left in a short time span, with basically no opportunity to reflect on how we understand the nature of God, a teenagers mind and the cultural context from which a question like this arises.

Mine goes "No, I don't think God sends nonbelievers to hell, because God is not in that business.  Plus it's not about what we believe, it's about the fact that God believes in us."

I received 308 text messages, and obviously I did not have time to answer them, so this week, I'm taking a little time here and there to answer questions by text messaging.

The kids love it.  Why?

Several reasons:  

1.  I'm not telling them to deny the reality of the world they live in by condemning social media or text messaging.  Actually, I'm embracing it.  They appreciate it.

2.  I may be having fun with them, even a little silly, but I remain the adult in the room.  In other words, when I answer their questions honestly, they appreciate and respect me. 

3.  It's interactive.  We no longer live in a world of presentations, we live in a world of engagement.

4.  I'm completely vulnerable, and they appreciate the risk I am taking.  They see me goof up, struggle, and when I don't know, well, they like that I don't know.

Then there is some other chemistry thing that happens, some kind of Holy Spirit moment, something I don't understand.  That happens too, and I don't understand it, but I live into the mystery of the Grace that passes all understanding.

Apple is changing its metaphors, should the church?

Apple will release a new operating system this September for the iphone and ipad.  It's called IOS 7, which, as you might have guessed is the seventh version of its operating system for these devices.  Word on the street, aka the internet, is that unlike previous upgrades this will be a whole new look, feel, indeed way of operating. Primarily, Apple is shanging the metaphors.  In the past, when you opened "Notepad" you found a little yellow pad with lines.  THis was a metaphor for, well, a notepad.  In the new version, Apple has decided that we are all native now.  We don't need those references to the old ways of doing things, we know we are in a digital world now.  At least, that is there operating assumption, I call is OA 2.

Now, before you go thinking, 'wow, dis bishop, he a really smaaaart guy,'  I must confess that what I've just written is a synopsis of a commentary I heard on Fresh Air today.  They have a new technology correspondent, Alexis Madrigal, and he outlined this understanding of metaphor.  He's the wicked smaaaart guy.  You can listen or read the essay here

 

(I'm writing this in the middle of a storm, so if I loose power - I'll complete it later.)

What I find fascinating about this work is a)  Apple is now assuming that we are all natives to this technology.  b)  They are just going to do it  c) According to Madrigal, Apple states that moving into the new operating system will be fairly smooth.

How old is this technology?  Oh, ah the original iphone is 6 years old, and it is now considered obsolete.  Six years! And they are changing the metaphors on us.  I love it.

-

SO what about our metaphors in the church life?  Let's start with God.  Whoa, stop right there Mr. Bishop, are you saying God is a metaphor.  No, I'm not saying God is a metaphor, but those three letters I just wrote G O D. Those letters, put in that particular order, that's a metaphor for something, someone we are attempting to describe.  But, as Kierkegaard remind us, "the God that can be known is not God."  What I'm trying to say, in my own inept way, is that when we speak or write or use language of any kind, we are not in fact touching that ultimate reality that is the ground of all being.  So, yes, the letters  G O D are a metaphor, for something that cannot be described.  

The downside of this shorthand language that we use to attempt to describe the source of all life, and light and love and hope in the universe, is that we can very easily fall into the trap of an increasingly narrow view of God.

Should we change our metaphor?  Ah, that would be a no, not in the ultimate sense.  But, I do believe we need to expand our language so that we don't stay locked in on one vision of God.  A quick search for the names or images of God in scripture reveals a great deal to choose from:

king, judge, shepherd, rock, lion, fortress, friend, father, co-worker, potter, wind, breath, vine, light, farmer, old woman, mother hen, bride-groom, fountain, gate, water, bread, fire.

A quick search of images of god in the Bible on Google images yielded some interesting choices.


The Breath of God.  Ruach in Hebrew.  Wind.  Hmmmmm, What would Google say?

So, I'm taking a page from Apple, and expanding my metaphors, as I seek to understand and articulate something, about someone who cannot ultimately be described, but to simply stop and say, oh why bother, that won''t do either, so let's go forward, knowing that we'll get some clues along the way, and ruach will be there, whether we name it or not.   

 

 

P.S. Run on sentence intentional.

 

 

 

What I Read on my Summer Vacation

The two books came to me from two very different sources, and while I had no intention of reading them back-to-back - that is what happened.  

Reza Aslan's narrative of the life of Jesus titled Zealot, and Lesley Hazelton's The First Muslim a narrative of the life of Mohammed.  Aslan's book came to my attention, as it did for many via the remarkably bizarre television interview on Fox Television.  I say bizarre, because the anchor so embarrasses herself and the viewing audience by chastising Aslan for writing a book on Jesus.  "How can you, a Muslim, write a book on Jesus?" she says.  You can view it here.  It would have been one thing if Aslan had written a book with a Muslim perspective on Jesus, i.e. making him a prophet in a long line of many prophets.  That would have been more controversial.  But, that is not what the book Zealot sets out to accomplish.  

In essence, what Reza Aslan has done is take the vast and growing scholarly research of the last century on the quest for the historical Jesus, and put it into a readable and mostly complete single volume.  What you find here in an accessible format is what most every graduate of a theological seminary has digested in his or her New Testament class.  So from that, point of view, Aslan is not all that radical.  His greatest gift is to pull together the work of John Dominic Crossan, John Meier, Raymond brown and Marcus Borg, and put together a single volume that your average adult could read.  He has done a good job, and the volume reads almost like a novel.  It's a read, as they say.

However, much of what is written about in the quest for the historical Jesus has not made it's way into the consciousness of your average person in the pew. Despite my own efforts for 25 years as a parish pastor, I still lament the lack of basic understanding as to how Lutherans in particular, and most modern Christians in general read the scriptures.  Therefore, if someone picks up this book and reads how only two of the four gospels contain a narrative of the Christmas stories, and Aslan makes the strong case that these were later additions by the early church - well, you might have some outraged parishioners knocking at your door demanding to know why Santa Claus has been taken out of Christmas.

I write this as a warning to those thinking they'll download Zealot onto their Kindle and dive in.  You may be in for a shock.  While Aslan does not dispute the healing or even the miracle stories, he lays out a case for a clear distinction between the Jesus of history (lived in Nazareth, raised as a peasant, rooted in 1st century Judaism) and the the Christ of faith (recast by Paul, narrated by John as the incarnate Word).  Perhaps one could even hear Martin Luther rolling over as Aslan makes a strong case for James, the brother of Jesus, and his emphasis on Faith without Good works is Dead, as the essence of what Jesus really intended.  No doubt there are flaws in Aslan's book, and others have written about them, such as Yale's Dale Martin, but the book gets it mostly right.  But, be prepared, to be disturbed, confused, and knocking on your pastor's door or email inbox with questions.

What Aslan has done for Jesus, Lesley Hazelton has done for Muhammed in her equally fine book The First Muslim.  I came across this book while searching through a series of TED talks.  Since TED usually does not cover religious subjects, I was surprised when I found her 17 minute talk on the value of doubt and it's integral role in faith.  Her talk is here.

My reading in Islam is dramatically more limited.  But I have attempted in recent years to explore and understand this religion.  Most significantly for a series called "Understanding Islam" that I assembled for my congregation in Rhode Island.  Admittedly the best part of that series were not to be found in my presentations, rather in the dialogue that began when a Pakistani physician, a Syrian civil engineer and an Egyptian professor showed up in response to a tiny newspaper article announcing the event.  The four of us sat for three Wednesday evenings and discussed Islam and Christianity.  

Lesley Hazelton has done for readers interested in the origins of Islam, what Reza Aslan has done for the origins of Christianity.  The First Muslim narrates the story of Muhammad from orphaned boy raised by bedouin shepherds through receiver of divine revelation to leader of an emerging nation.  She carefully separates out the historical and biographical from the later additions of tradition, in much the same way as Aslan has done for Jesus.  There are some fascinating parallels in these two books, for instance one can see the strong emphasis in both Jesus and Muhammad for correcting the dramatic gulf between the rich and the poor.  Both men saw this from early life experiences where those in power had vast amounts of wealth compared to those in abject poverty.

Hazelton is a fine writer, and makes this the most accessible of all the books I have read on Islam.  She is not without her critics who have reviewed the book less favorably.  But, again, I would argue her purpose is to be as true to the research as possible, while maintaining an eye on composing an accessible narrative.

-

Why were these two books brought to my attention at the same time?  No, I am not suggesting that I intuited some revelation, divine or otherwise.   I am seeing a connection and a problem, as well as an opportunity.

The connection in both of these books is an extension of the Bultmanian demythologizing project.  Rudolf Bultman was the German biblical scholar who stripped all the myth, fantasy and fiction out of scripture.  The effort was to boil it down to its core essence.  Both Aslan and Hazelton have taken the scholarship of their respective fields and written a book that is fairly easy for a modern educated adult to digest.  We are left with a good story of some amazing men who quite possibly had some kind of divine connection/revelatory encounter, and endeavored to right the wrongs of the social injustices of their times.  If that is the case, then why bother following one or the other for that matter.  (Similar books have been written about the Buddha and other religious figures)  This problem is why we have seen a dramatic increase in fundamentalism in all religions around the world.  "Just get back to the fundamentals of our faith.  Don't engage in scholarship.  Read the words as they are written before us and apply them" These are among the statements and attitudes.  One can understand why this response has such an appeal.

But, ignoring the scholarship, not using our own (I believe God given intellect) to sort through the matter, would be a greater injustice.  Among all the themes of this blog, I'm trying to encourage a way through this 'stuff'  - a public wrestling with the questions, doubts and wonderings of a modern or post-modern guy.  What does it mean for me as a Christian to embrace scriptures that are the inspired word of God (note I did not say inerrant word of God)?  What does it mean that I live in an age of science where the depths of atoms and the expanse of the universe are vastly more significant than when Isaiah was stomping around ancient Israel?  What does it mean to be a follower of a first century peasant who was so outraged by the economic inequalities of his time that he was willing to openly challenge the leadership of his religion, and I live in a time of equal, if not greater inequalities?  What does the newfound 'science' of psychology teach us about the power of myth, meaning and dreams, both now and in the time of Joseph?

If you want quick short, matter of fact answers, you can check last night's scoreboard to see how the Red Sox faired.  While I'll look for that information on ESPN.com, this is the place to explore, in the words of the unknown author of the New Testament book of Hebrews, 'faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the assurance of things not seen.'

 

Bishop to Bishop

Mike Rinehart, Bishop of the Gulf Coast Synod is about as active as any of us.  In addition to bishoping between New Orleans and Houston, he's got a family, blogs regularly at BishopMike.com, and rides a motorcycle.  He also is an eager learner, and enjoys interviewing people.  Wow!  Great idea.  You can listen to his interviews and podcasts at his site here.

Mike chose me for a conversation last week while at the Church Wide Assembly.  Click below to have a listen, it's about 10 minutes in length.

By the way, I'll be on vacation til Aug 29, so don't expect much activity here until then.

The interview can be had here.

 

 

What Happened in Pittsburgh?

What Happened in Pittsburgh?

On Wednesday of this week, over 900 people, nearly 60% of them attending their first Church Wide Assembly, came to Pittsburgh with the honest expectation, myself included, that we would re-elect Bishop Mark Hanson for a third term as Presiding Bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.  But, that did not occur.  What happened? 

On Wednesday we elected Bishop Elizabeth Eaton as the new Presiding Bishop, she is the Bishop of the Northeast Ohio Synod on a final ballot of 600 votes to 277 for Bishop Hanson.  

I do believe that there were multiple forces at work here.  The first is our North American preference for the new.  There was a time when baseball coaches could stay with a team for decades, but the era of Walter Alliston, Tommy Lasorda, Joe McCarthy, Casey Stengell is no more.  We tire of our US Presidents in their second term, regardless of political party.  Some of what I was hearing in Pittsburgh reflected this view.  In other words, it was not Mark Hanson in particular, he is well loved, it was the idea of a third term.  As one person said to me, “I am a believer of allowing new leadership to regularly come forward.” 

As the days unfolded and the ballot results were announced, there was a spirit of ‘something new’ in the air.  This is hard to explain.  There was no campaigning, no strategy, no back room deals.  But, as the second ballot announced who had decided to stay on the ballot, the men stepped back, and the women did not.  There were eleven male bishops in the first ballot.  We all stepped back and removed our names from the ballot.  We did this not for some planned strategy, but, candidly, none of us sensed a call to serve as Presiding Bishop.  Yet, it seemed the Spirit was speaking to the women.

Elizabeth Eaton spoke with clarity and candor.  Her sense of humor was evident.  She spoke theologically, but in a way that was down to earth.  She reached out, as is her style, to the broad diversity of our church.  It became clear throughout the day, that Elizabeth was the right person for the call.  In fact, the votes were revealed that she was the obvious choice.  The election was not even close, she actually almost won on the fourth ballot. The Holy Spirit was speaking loud and clear.

I believe she will be a fine servant.  She understands the landscape of life in our congregations and culture.  Elizabeth is a strong leader, and I look forward to her serving as our Presiding Bishop.

Bishop Eaton is a graduate of Harvard Divinity School, and attended University Lutheran Church in Cambridge, MA for a period during her studies.

Rev. Elizabeth Eaton elected Presiding Bishop of the ELCA

I am working on a more detailed post, but wanted to get this press release out to all of you.

(RNS) The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America on Wednesday (Aug. 14) elected the Rev. Elizabeth Eaton as the denomination’s first female presiding bishop. Eaton received 600 votes against incumbent Presiding Bishop Mark Hanson, who received 287.

Eaton, the current ELCA bishop of the Cleveland-based Northeast Ohio Synod, is married to the Rev. Conrad Selnick, an Episcopal priest. 

A native of Cleveland, she received a master of divinity degree from Harvard Divinity School.

Elizabeth Eaton was elected presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

Elizabeth Eaton was elected presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America. Photo courtesy ELCA

“We are a church that is overwhelmingly European in a culture that is increasingly pluralistic,” Eaton told the ELCA Churchwide Assembly in Pittsburgh shortly after the election.

“We need to welcome the gifts of those who come from different places, that is a conversation we need to have as a church.”

Hanson is credited with leading the nation’s largest Lutheran body — with more than 4 million members in 9,638 congregations — with a steady hand during turbulent times.

The election was a surprise to many, as Hanson was expected to win an unprecedented third term after 12 years in office. Hanson was the third presiding bishop in the denomination’s history; three of four finalists for the position were women.

(RNS) The Rev. Mark Hanson, presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, delivers a sermon at the Lutheran Church of the Redeemer in Jerusalem. Religion News Service file photo courtesy of ELCA News Service.

 

(RNS) The Rev. Mark Hanson, presiding bishop of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.

“When I stood before you 12 years ago, I told you this is not an election won, this is a call received. And now this call has been extended to Bishop Eaton,” Hanson said at the assembly. “This is a humble and a holy privilege to serve the gospel as the pastor of this whole church.”

Eaton joins Episcopal Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, who in 2006 became the first woman to lead a church in the worldwide Anglican Communion. The two churches share a full communion agreement that allows shared clergy and joint ministry.

Eaton will serve a six-year term beginning Nov. 1.

What is happening in Pittsburgh?

I am sitting in the convention center in Pittsburgh during the election process for our Presiding Bishop. There are, effectively, four candidates on the ballot at this time. Bishop Hanson, Bishop Jessica Crist, Bishop Eaton, Bishop Svennungsen. Three women and a man. As the results have been unfolding in these days, and it became evident with the results of each ballot that this was not going to be an automatic reelection for Bishop Hanson, the conversations are coming forward around the question listed above.

My sense is that a few things are going on? First, we are in a cultural and societal upheaval that is impacting all aspects of life. This is not the world any of us grew up in. Rapid and earthquake-like shock waves are unfolding across education, government, psychology, religion, economics. EVERYWHERE. That is a very important factor, that should not be ignored.

Second, we live in a time of impatience with leaders. Let me clear, this is not a critique of any one person or leader. Rather, it is a factor. In the United States the public becomes tired of its leaders quickly. This has been evident with our public view of United States Presidents. Today, there is already talk of 2016 presidential elections, yet President Obama has only just begun his second term.

Third. One person approached me and said, "What do you know about this strategy of having all women candidates as the alternative?" I immediately said something to the affect of, first off that is not what is happening. There is no strategy. I think what is going on here is the emerging collective feminine voice. Notice that there were many men who were in the top 20' myself included. All of the men stepped back. Why? We each have our own reasons. Bishop Mike Rinehart expressed thoughts that I resonate. For me, I have just begun to serve in New England. I'm having a good challenge and a good time. Regardless of our various reasons, some eleven different men stepped back. Yet, the women did not. They allowed themselves to be available for the call. There is much more I could write about this, but the speeches are about to begin, and I want to be in discernment about this process.

 

What I've learned after 144

No, this is not my age.

As I prepare to hop on a plane to Pittsburgh for the ELCA Churchwide Assembly, followed by two weeks of vacation on Marthas Vineyard with the President, I thought I'd stop in with a brief report of my time as nearly a year as Bishop of the New England Synod.  144 is the number of congregations I was able to visit in my first full year. There are 184 congregations of the New England Synod, and it is my intent to get to the rest of those congregations in the coming year.

These visits have allowed me to connect with the vast majority of our churches and people, as well as clergy along with rostered leaders. I tell people that it is the best part of my work in this first year.  And that is true, therefore, it is my intent to continue visiting, preaching and being a mobile bishop.

In addition, my staff of Associates all live throughout the New England region, and they will also be on the road making connections in the regions they serve.

What have I learned in these 144 visits to congregations, plus Camp Calumet, Hospitals, University campuses, etc?

I could make a list, and come up with a David Letterman top 10, but today, I'm less interested in a series of bullet points.  No, I'm looking for a common thread.  The one overarching Hegelian theme that ties it all together. I thought I had it, but then a series of conversations last week, made me realize, nope that's not it either.  Then last night, a Baptist preacher brought it all home to me.  My translation of his delving into greek origins of words, history of Tyndale's english translation, and Biblical epic narrative of first century christianity:  

People don't want church anymore, they want authentic community.

Church is a bad word for most people, but authentic community represents our deepest human desire.  

While a few of you may be disturbed by that statement, most of you who read this blog know what I'm talking about.  Many of us are tired of what the word 'church' represents - crumbling buildings, people arguing about finance and membership, food fights about non-essentials, idolatry, performance anxiety (as in putting on the happy face, clothes, etc in order to measure up).  

Yet, in the words of Brene Brown, "everywhere I go in my consulting with churches people talk about how all these people are leaving the church, but everywhere I go in my research work all I meet are people who all they want to do is talk about spirituality."

Authentic community, a modern phrase that seeks to capture the original intent of the greek word Ekklesia, is what people long for in their lives.  Opportunities to grow in faith, in connection with others, in a sense of being recognized and honored for the flawed and imperfect people that we are - that my friends is what Jesus Christ is all about.  (I'm starting to engage my preacher voice in my head)  So people want church, but not church.  They want ekklesia (gathering, assembly, authentic community) but not church (small mindedness, cheap grace, etc)

What I've learned after a 144 church visits is that people don't want church as a place to go and do things, they desire a church that is a gathering of people who will be with them on the journey of life.  That's our goal, and that is Jesus goal. 

It will not be easy to get there. Why?  because, as much as we desire it two things stand in our way.  One is external.  We have structures that actually impede movement toward this goal.  The other is more challenging, because it is internal. As much as we desire this authentic jesus community, we also are so frightened by it that we sabbaotage any effort.  It will not be easy, but it is where God is calling us. But if we are willing to risk, be vulnerable and laugh along the way, I believe we can move toward being ekklesia - a gathering of disciples living in authentic community for the good of the world.

 

 

 

How I'd change seminary education - Part 1

This is the beginning of a series of blog posts, that will eventually end up as a paper or article on the subject.  I'm laying these thoughts out here in bits and pieces, kinda like post it notes on the dining room table.  Later I'll rearrange the order and edit and such.

While enjoying a mocha frappucino (did I spell that right?) at Starbucks, after my doctor called and said my cholesterol numbers were good, I engaged in conversation with one of our pastors.  We were discussing the state of the Christian faith, the ELCA, frustrations with parish ministry.  Then he said, "I love the church, but seminary didn't really prepare me to lead the church.  I was told if I preached the gospel, loved the people and was faithful, I would succeed as a pastor. But that's not enough"  

I graduated from seminary 25 years ago, and said the same thing.  I have colleagues who graduated 35 years ago and said the same thing.  Now I'm hearing the same thing from pastors who graduated five or ten years ago.  What's going on here?

First off, the broad consensus of pastors I talk to is that seminary education is an excellent education in the areas of biblical studies, church history and theology/ethics.  I've not heard a single criticism of those fields of study, and many pastors have said to me, "that is my most treasured learning from seminary."   So, I want to begin with a strong heart, head and soul affirmation of that aspect of seminary.  Later I'll detail more on the positives, with ideas on how to take that strength and leverage it.

But, leading a congregation requires other gifts that need addressing.  Today, I'll speak to one area by way of a book review.

John Kotter's Buy In,  is the latest from the author in his Leading Change series of books.  Kotter taught at the Harvard Business School for years, and then discovered his research was in such demand he could run his own little institute, and probably make a ton of money consulting with corporations.  

While the whole Leading Change series is worth digesting, Buy In, represents a key component of leading a congregation.  This book describes the process whereby people come to hear of a new idea and move from suspicion to not only acceptance, but complete 'buy in' and ownership of the idea.

Kotter's method is soundly and honorable consistent with a Christ like approach to leadership.  It's not manipulative, and it honors the other with respect and dignity.

Much of what a parish pastor is called to do in this new emerging world of mission is to secure buy in from people for some new way of doing ministry.  That is not an easy thing to do.  It is also not an exclusively church related challenge, which is why Kotter is in demand by major corporations all over the world.  Almost every industry that I know is under going turmoil, and needs to move in new directions.  

Teaching the process for leading change in congregations should be the number two priority in a seminary education, right after the theological foundation.  Pastors are entering congregations that at best are aware of a need to practice ministry in a new way, or at worst are in complete denial about the reality of the situation around them.  There is a clear spectrum from one degree to another.  The major task of a pastor in today's congregations is to define reality, gather a group of motivated persons, collectively work with that group to seek a God infused next chapter, and then work to get as many as possible (you don't need everyone) to buy in and move toward that new chapter.

I'll be honest. This is extremely difficult work.  As I point out in the sermon below, parish ministry is one of the toughest jobs in America today.  But, we owe it to the next and maybe even the current generation of leaders to give them the tools to have a better shot at it.  Leading change can be taught.  Yes, it must also be learned while doing, but laying a foundation in seminary will provide resources for our congregations.

I should end this post with some clarifying points. 1) Seminary education is vital to our church, and I am an avid supporter.  2) The love of learning and exploring theology and faith is a gift from my own seminary education that I will forever treasure.  3) I want a robust seminary education to be a part of our pastors preparation for ministry.

I'll write more on this subject as the post it notes in my brain get going.

 

The Role of a Pastor - A Sermon Preached in Kingston, RI

Below is a link to an audio recording of my sermon preached this past week at Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd in Kingston, RI.  The congregation is currently in the call process.  I was invited to lead worship, preach and answer questions about the process for seeking a new pastor.  I recorded the sermon with the intention of making it available to everyone, especially congregations in call process.

Here is the link ---> Click here

A new window in your browser will open, and it should start to play automatically.  If not, click on the play button, a little triangle on the left side.  The sermon runs 19 minutes in length.

Our Own Little Universe

I am working on another post, "Toward a Mature Spirituality", based on my weekend retreat with Dr. James Hollis, but that's still maturing.  Instead, you get this...

Tonight, I realized how myopic I've gotten with this whole conversation about worship and church, see my post below in response to Racel Evans.  I suddenly found myself convicted as I sat before the magic screen today and watched this interview with David Carr on Charlie Rose.  I've been a David Carr follower ever sense that amazing PBS special on the radical changes in the newspaper industry, Page One.  Since I'm a former journalism major/video hack/photographer/drama queen college guy, I still have a fantasy of being the Guy Noire of some newspaper. (OK, that fantasy has now dissappeared, mostly)

The interview runs 25 minutes, but I encourage you to set aside the time to digest it.  Around the 18 minute mark, David says, "we are going to be able to program our own little universe."

Program our own little universe?  I heard that line and thought, HOLY MOLY BATMAN, what's this mean for the faith, all faiths?  I've long maintained that our greatest competition in post-modern society has been Hollywood. No, I'm not one of those, Hollywood is destroying the family values that made this country great, kinda preachers.  Rather, I'm thinking about the power of narrative as the driving force in human consciousness, from those cave drawings on the wall 10,000 plus years ago, through all the great literature, both sacred and profane, to the modern era.  Narrative is what shapes us and molds us as a species.

The Bible contains amazing narrative and Moses, Ruth, David & Bathsheeba, Job, Jesus.  We kill the Bible when we turn it into a constitutional document.  Those stories have power, because the narratives sink deep into our souls and do work over the long haul.  As a Christian, I am partial to the stories of biblical literature.  But, that doesn't mean I'm also not fond of the narratives of Homer, the Buddha, Native American mythologies, Shakespeare, Zora Neale Hurston and Flannery O'Connor.  

The new narratives are being written by Hollywood. George Lucas did more to interpret Zen Buddhism and The Hero with a Thousand Faces to North America through his Star Wars movies, than any great lecture series. Francis Ford Coppola did more to interpret the Vietnam War and Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness in his epic Apocalypse Now than any Time magazine article. Juno was a wonderful movie that balanced out the vapid portrayal of teenagers, with a reminder that the youngest among us can rise to a level of maturity, despite our best efforts to reduce teenagers to the lowest common denominator.

If David Carr is right, and I suspect he is, we will, and maybe already are, programming our own little universe, what is the implication for faith, public civil discourse, human community?  Is part of our increasingly divided politics a result of the fact that many of us are only talking to like minded people?  Are traditional forms of religion and faith being squeezed out of our lives because we now get our life shaping narrative from the box? Are the stories being told in "House of Cards", "Lillyhammer" and "The Sopranos" more interesting, more entertaining than Jacob & Isaac? Where does the equal need for human community come into play in this era of home movie watching?

I want to suggest that the church, and churches consider diving into this realm.  No, we cannot produce Hollywood style films, nor should we attempt to produce some of those vapid sugar-coated Christian tv shows. I'm thinking of embracing "Breaking Bad" and connecting the narrative to some of the equally "Breaking Bad with Cane and Abel" scriptures.  In the interview above, Carr describes a series of interesting protagonists in modern Netflix films.  Can we engage these characters with some of the darker sides of those scripture characters.  

I wonder if the church has sugar coated the shadow side of our biblical characters, and thus washed them clean of their, well, humanity.  We embrace a theology of saint and sinner in each person, so let's explore that theme with Don Draper, Francis Underwood and Nurse Jackie.

My thought upon beginning this blog post, was holy cow Batman, we are debating worship styles, when the rest of the culture is programming their own universe and we are not even a part of the conversation.  So bag that Bible Study you just bought from the church publishing house, and get a stinkin' $8 per month Netflix subscription, invite people over for some theological brewing on the narratives glowing in everyone's living room. There's a lifetime of material, and I suspect that over time, the conversation will mature and people in your little group will open up, and the narratives of their own lives will come forth.  Then you'll be on to something as film, scripture and life dramas collide.

* If this post has a higher than normal punctuation, spelling and grammar error quotient, it's cause I was typing so fact, cause I wanna head downstairs form the next showing of "Orange is the New Black,"

 

Is Rachel Held Evans right?

One of the more articulate spokespersons for a new generation of Christians is Rachel Held Evans.  She is a 30 something, 32 to be exact but my mommma told me never to give away a woman’s age. She's an evangelical christian, sorta kinda, drop out and drop in on the church type.  Hey, I got no problem with that, as I myself was an outsider for 21 years, and have wondered for the last 33 if I really do belong here.  This morning I did, but this afternoon, well, I just wanted as much distance as possible.  She is smart, savy, funny and has her pulse on the latest and greatest.  She’s written two books, and blogs frequently here.

 

Today’s article on CNN.com “Why millenials are leaving the church” is getting a lot of thumbs up on social media.  It is definitely worth a read, and besides CNN will appreciate the fact that you clicked through to it, as the metrics will mean more advertising revenue.  I enjoyed it so much I read it three times.

 

But then I started seeing some of the responses on Facebook and Twitter.  While most were harmless or bold “likes”, every once and a while I saw a post that made me realize the profound truth of the author Anais Nin.  She said, “We don’t see things as they are, we see things as we are.”

I saw this most clearly in this post on Facebook. “Evans is so right.  I’ve been saying for 30 years that keeping liturgy the same is what will bring people back to church.”   Hmmmm, really?  Is that what she is saying?  Yes, she does indicate a preference in her generation for liturgical forms of worship.  The exact quote is:  “Many of us, myself included, are finding ourselves increasingly drawn to high church traditions Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, the Episcopal Church, etc. precisely because the ancient forms of liturgy seem so unpretentious, so unconcerned with being “cool,” and we find that refreshingly authentic” 

But, my guess is that Held would also agree that there is no one size fits all for millenials or any generation.  I fear that my friend who posted on Facebook might be suggesting that a return to a certain form of liturgy is the key answer, the magic clue, the easy way forward.  I would argue that what this generation or anyone outside or on the margins of the church is really attracted to can be summed up in this statement by Evans:  “We’re not leaving the church because we don’t find the cool factor there; we’re leaving the church because we don’t find Jesus there.”

I’ve been to lots of different churches, both recently as a newly elected bishop, but also over many years as a curious Christian seeking out an authentic way to worship in this empire context called North America.  I’ve been in amazing worship settings in Pentecostal charismatic settings with hands held high, as well as Lutheran and Greek Orthodox settings that were truly magnificent magnificat. I’ve also been in the most vapid and pretentious worship services in those same or similar traditions. I’ve connected with God while worshipping at Willow Creek, and been equally repelled in the same setting a few years later. 

As a pastor, when I lived in New York City I embraced the high liturgy of Lutheran worship, because the context was culturally and spiritually appropriate.  But, I also worked to add a more relaxed worship service with musical rhythms of rock n roll music, because there were those in our neighborhood in Brooklyn who connected with God in that style.  In Rhode island, we did what some people call contemporary worship, but I like to refer to as culturally appropriate worship. Yes, I wore blue jeans once for a drama, but most of the time I dressed like I was right off the pages of Land's End, not because I wanted to be cool, but because that's the way I like to dress.

In our New England Synod, I’ve witnessed authentic and powerful worship with jazz music at Zion Lutheran in Pittsfield, MA, formal liturgy and beautiful organ music at Trinity Lutheran in Worcester, MA, and a more relaxed guitar and drum driven worship at Sanctuary, Marshfield, MA. I've danced with the Puerto Rican rhythms of spanish language worship at Iglesia Luterana and Gloria Dei in Providence.  I cannot believe that God wants me to pick one of these as the 'right way.'  The common theme was an authenticity, a hard to describe connection with the numinous, and well, a hard to describe match between the people in worship and the leadership.

I’m going to invert Evan’s statement from above and rephrase what I see. “People are returning to churches because they find Jesus there.”  And, I don’t mean that statement in some prefab everybody’s saying “Jesus loves you” kinda way.  What I see is congregations that are seriously attempting to engage their communities are being Jesus communities.  To quote Bonhoeffer: “The Church is the Church only when it exists for others...not dominating, but helping and serving. It must tell men of every calling what it means to live for Christ, to exist for others.” 

These churches are making a difference in the lives of people who don’t frequent the door of a church building.  They are serving meals, raising funds to keep swimming pools open in the city in summer when municipalities are fiscally constrained, they start AIDS ministry, they are starting medical clinics, they are providing pro bono legal services, they are reading to children in first grade. AND THEN  They are connecting worship to that Jesus servant lifestyle in a way that speaks to the pain and suffering of human life.  They are not providing sermons on 6 points to raise your stock portfolio, but they might do a series on 12 steps of AA and Christianity.  They are telling biblical stories of Job, and Hosea, and Peter, and connecting them to the suffering of life, and the peculiar way inwhich God enters into that pain, not to fix it, but to somehow be present. In that presence, there is a redemption.  After all who hasn’t wondered why is God punishing me like Job, or why has my spouse run off with another (Hosea), or denied the very existence of God/Jesus (Peter).  These are not old stories, these are living stories that are alive today, its just the names are changed.

My point, if there is only one here, is to encourage us to look, not for easy answers.  (Fix the worship, fix the Sunday school, fix the way we receive the offering)  No, the answer is to embrace the challenge, and realize that authenticity is really really hard work.  It is marathon work, not sprinters work.  In a person it takes a lifetime of community, honesty and vulnerability.  In a church, it’s, well, it’s even harder, cause you are working with people.  Some people want to grow, some people think they wanna grow, some people think they’re done, and most people are doing the best they can.

Here’s to the journey, and the reminder that most of all of us are doing the best we can.  Somehow, that's an attempt at Grace.